“教的更少,学得更多”课程的设计内容要求(What a typical“Teach Less, Learn More”course design needs)

A typical“Teach Less, Learn More”course design :
1. Aims (When designing aims, please keep in mind that we want to teach them how to learn and think, thus should emphasize: how learning this module can help students learn and think generally (this part will be more on critical thinking and relational thinking) and more specifically on this subject matter (this part will more be on think like an expert in this discipline, the big picture, the core concepts and their connections), how to make them appreciate this discipline. )
2. Prerequisite
3. A big cmap for the big picture
4. A set of topics, their cmaps and rationale of its usage in presenting the big picture
5. Course arrangement, contents and homeworks for each class
6. References, reading materials, course projects and expected hours of work

一个“教的更少,学得更多”课程的设计:
1. 目标 (在设计目标的时候,要围绕着课程的主旨——教会学生学习和思考,于是要关注这个模块如何帮助学生更一般地学习和思考(这个部分要突出批判性思维、系联性思考),以及如何帮助学生做这个学科的学习和思考(这个部分要突出如何像这个领域的专家一样来思考,这个学科的大图景),以及如何使得学生们学会欣赏和开始喜欢这个学科。
2. 对学生的要求
3. 反映大图景的大图
4. 分解以后的小图,专题,以及理据性——为什么要讲这些专题,它们如何实现上面的目标
5. 课程内容的时间安排
6. 参考文献,学习材料,作业,课程项目,以及学生需要花的时间的估计

《学会学习和思考之理解型学习理念和技能》设计

Learning how to learn and think: Ideas and skills of meaningful learning
学会学习和思考课程理念和技能训练模块

MeaningfulLearningwithExamples

Objectives
1. Understand what is meaningful learning and be able to apply it at least when reminded
2. Be able to use concept maps to organize ideas and thoughts to help think better (deeper, right on the key spot, more creative)
3. A good understanding of the ways of thinking behind concept mapping: relational thinking and critical thinking
4. (Together with the subject module) Learning by doing (thus lots of homeworks, discussions, critical feedback)
5. (Together with the subject module) Learning for the big picture of the discipline, which includes typical ways of thinking, typical subjects of studies, typical methods of analysis, it connections to the real world.
6. Some techniques for a better learner, such as asking the WHWM questions (What, How, Why and Meaningful), learning from teaching your peers, using concept maps for books reading etc.

课程目标
1. 明白什么是理解型学习,并且能够在被提醒做理解型学习的时候运用它
2. 能够使用概念地图来组织思考和思想来做到更深入、到位和更具有创造性的思考
3. 对于概念地图背后的思考方式:系联性思考和批判性思维,具有一定的理解
4. (和具体学科模块一起)学会做中学(通过大量的作业、讨论、批判)
5. (和具体学科模块一起)学会提炼学科大图景以及用它来帮助学习(典型问题、对象、思维方式、分析方法、和世界以及其他学科的关系)
6. 其他的一些学习技巧,例如WHWM分析阅读和写作、同伴教学、概念地图整理文献等

Reading materials(学习材料):
1. 吴金闪《概念地图教学和学习方法》
2. 参考书:Whitehead Aims of Education (《教育的目的》)、Novak Learning, creating and using knowledge (《学习、创造与使用知识——概念图促进企业和学校的学习变革》)
3. Ted Talks视频:
Ken Robinson: Changing education paradigms,Ken Robinson教育的问题和出路四重奏,创造性和现代教育的目的
Ken Robinson: How to escape education’s death valley
Ken Robinson: Bring on the learning revolution!
Ken Robinson: Do schools kill creativity?
Chris Anderson: Questions no one knows the answers to,好奇心、科学和教育
Christopher Emdin: Teach teachers how to create magic,教学本身需要创造性
Clint Smith: The danger of silence,让每个人都问你所想问,说你所想说
Liz Coleman: A call to reinvent liberal arts education,什么是真正的通识教育
Patrick Awuah: How to educate leaders? Liberal arts,通识教育和社会
Roger Antonsen: Math is the hidden secret to understanding the world,关于“理解”和数学,以及数学作为现实的表示
Hans Rosling: Let my dataset change your mindset,数学可以很有趣并且改变你的思想
Conrad Wolfram: Teaching kids real math with computers,数学的四个阶段(提出问题、抽象化、计算求解、验证和提高)和当前数学教育以及可能的解决方案
Dan Meyer: Math class needs a makeover,数学教育和粗糙问题的关系
4. Joseph Novak: Life experience and meaningful learning,通过Novak自己的生活经验来更好地理解概念地图、理解型学习

Prerequisite(先修课以及对学生的要求)
None, except being a deeper thinking or be willing/eager to be a deep thinker, to go beyond rote learning, beyond being a machine that memorizes and recalls factual knowledge. Good communication skills in English (this course will be offered in English).

无,除了要求是一个深入的思考者,或者具有成为一个深入的思考者的意愿和渴望。对基于记忆和事实性知识的学习的不满,强烈的超越它的愿望。熟练的英语听说(课程为全英文授课)。

Course format and schedule(课程形式和时间安排)
Every night of the two weeks, 3 hours per night. Monday, Wednesday and Friday are for formal class while Tuesday and Thursday are for tutorial class. Teachers and TAs are mainly there to help each student learn things that each student likes to learn with meaningful learning. Only the first day, there will be lectures. The rest of the days will be more like workshops or tutorial sessions, where students will the main players while Teachers and TAs will simply be organizers and helpers. During the last few sessions, students will present what they have learned during these days and get feedback from the whole class.
两周的时间,每周的每个晚上,三个小时。周一三五是正课,周二四是习题课。只有在第一天的课堂上,会有传统的讲授课堂。其他时间,老师和助教的责任是帮助你学习任何你挑选的希望学习的材料。在最后两次课,学生们会做学习报告并得到课堂反馈。

Day one(第一次课)
Lectures from the instructor(s), questions and discussions are encouraged: Course information including goals, format, and expectation from students; Using examples to illustrate the key ideas of meaningful learning, including relational thinking and critical thinking, goals of learning, goals of teaching, the WHWM questions and concept mapping; Using examples to illustrate what is concept map and how to construct a concept map, including key ideas like focus question, key message, key concepts and connections among them with explicit linking phrase, overall organization of concept maps.

Students are expected to decide topics of their studies and form groups.

教师传达课程理念、课程信息、学习目标;用例子来体现理解型学习,尤其是系联性思考和批判性思维,以及WHWM分析阅读和写作方法,概念地图制作的技术等和理解型学习的关系;用例子来展示概念地图和概念地图制作的技术,尤其是焦点问题、主要信息、主要概念、概念关系和联系、概念的组织形式。

学生们应该在这次课程结束以后找到自己想学习的主题和问题,并形成学习小组(2-3人)。

Day two(第二次课)
Help students learn the topics of their own choices, which should run by instructors and Tas, with meaningful learning, which again refers to identify the key questions and to learn and apply the typical ways of thinking of that discipline and also relational and critical thinking, and with explicit use of concept maps.

老师和助教以及学生们共同帮助学生们采用理解型学习的方式学习学生们选择的主题和问题。这些主题和问题要想助教和老师报备。学习问题最好能够反应这个学科的大图景(典型对象、问题、思维方式、分析方法、和世界的关系)。学习过程中用好概念地图来组织概念,注意系联性思考和批判性思维。

Day three-four(第三、四次课)
Trial presentations from students and critical comments, continue helping students’ learning on their own. After this trial presentation, students are expected to further improve their learning skills and their understanding/answers of the topics that those choose to study in their own time and during the tutorial classes.

学生们对学习结果做初步报告:经过上面的理解型学习,所关注问题是不是能够回答了,这个回答是不是能够和学科大图景联系起来,并且比较深入。注意,这一轮初步报告完成之后,是学生提升学习能力和对问题的理解的最关键的时期,用好这段期间的学生自己的时间以及习题课的时间。

Day five-six(第五、六次课)
Students presentations, discussions, using the WHWM questions (What I want to express, how to express, why this and why in this way, meaningful to audience).

学生正式报告学习结果和讨论、反馈。主讲人要回答好WHWM问题——我最告诉我的同学们什么、我想怎么说、为什么我要说这个为什么我要这样说、为什么我认为这值得我的同学们来知道和理解。

Course project (课程项目)

First, the above oral presentation on topics/questions that chosen by students, and with the concept maps related to this presentation.

Second, a summary, in forms of concept maps and also with sufficient amount of words to explain the concept maps, of what you have learned from this module, hand in together after you finish the whole course. It is strongly suggested that you do such a summary right after this module and revise it later.

Third, feedbacks, besides summarizing things that you have learned, you may also provide feedbacks to the course, the instructors and the TAs. If you prefer, you may combine the second and the third together in the same document.

1、上面完成的自选主题和问题的口头报告以及相应的概念地图。
2、一份课程学习报告,用概念地图和文字的形式,来总结你从本课程学到了什么。这个文档整个课程完成之后提交。但是,建议你在第一部分完成之后就总结这个模块,将来再更新,以防遗忘。
3、一份对课程、主讲人、助教的反馈。如果你愿意,你也可以把课程学习报告和反馈结合在同一个文档里面。

Grades of this module (50% of the course) will be based on both this summary and feedback (25%) and your final presentation (25%).
本课程的50%的分数来自于这个模块。本模块的分数的一半来自于这个总结和反馈,另一半来自于你的口头报告。

Course workload(课程工作量)
Formal classes 3*6=18 hours, tutorial class 4*3=12 hours, study course materials (vidoes and books) about 30 hours, prepare for the presentation after classes no less than 10 hours. Course project: 10 hours and more.

Participating tutorial classes and talking to your TA and instructors might save you quite a lot of time. Make good use of them.

Warning: If you are not seriously interested in meaningful learning, learning things like an expert but not like dictionaries, and willing to spend the time and effort, Please DO NOT choose this course. It will not be easy, although it should be rewarding and meaningful.

正课时间每天3小时(3*6=18小时),习题课时间每天3小时(4*3=12小时),课后看所有的视频(约20小时)和书(约10小时),为口头报告做准备(基本在习题课时间完成),完成课程设计作业(约10小时),完成课程学习报告(约10小时)。课后思考,相信我肯定会有很多,时间不可计。

注意:课程配有助教,习题课不强制要求参加但是会大大缩短你准备的时间和提高你学习的效果。

警告:本课程需要你大量的时间和精力的投入,做主动学习,而不是听听课而已。如果你做不到,或者你对记忆型学习非常满意,请不要来选择这门课程。

Central tasks and rationales(核心教学内容和理据性)

We have choose to teach a few key ideas and a few key techniques to help students’ meaningful learning. In this section, we would like to explain the rationales for all those things that we decide to teach.

下面是对教学内容的分解以及为什么要叫这个学这个的回答。每一项的概念地图稍后再更新。

1. Why meaningful learning?(to be continued)
1、为什么要教和学理解型学习?(稍后更新)
2. Why relational thinking and critical thinking?(to be continued)
2、为什么需要系联性思考和批判性思维?(稍后更新)
3. Why concept mapping? (to be continued)
3、为什么需要概念地图?(稍后更新)
4. Why we suggest to watch Ken Robinson Ted talks? (to be continued)
4、为什么建议学习Ken Robison的Ted Talks?(稍后更新)

《学会学习和思考之地球科学》设计

Learning How to Learn and Think: Geologic Reasoning Concept Mapping Workshop

Beijing Normal University
September 11-22, 2017

Kip Ault, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus
Lewis & Clark Graduate School of Education and Counseling
Portland, Oregon
USA
www.darwinianwhimsy.com

1. Aims:

Meaningful learning requires making connections among concepts and from concepts to experiences. When structured around core concepts, these connections lead to disciplinary expertise and insight.

Habits of mind characteristic of different disciplines develop in response to distinct challenges. As a result the structures of knowledge differ from one field to another. Concept mapping and Vee diagramming promise to bring such structures into focus, making learning efficient. (Concept maps are drawings that depict networks of relationships and hierarchy among concepts. Vee diagrams deploy concept maps in order to represent the structure of knowledge in the context of an inquiry.)

Geologic reasoning responds to challenges of scale and the contingent nature of historical phenomena. Often analogical approaches—comparison and contrast—play an important role in geologic inquiry.

Comparing one place to another, in terms of its geologic history and climate pattern, for example, has the potential to illuminate the “big picture” while fostering a “deep love” for knowledge. Geologic inquiry often depends on finding modern analogues for historical processes.

Plate tectonics theory and the geologic time scale are two “big ideas” essential to organizing meaningful understanding of geology. The former can be illustrated with attention to the patterns and processes characteristic of plate boundaries and collisions. The interpretation of the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River reveals the power of insight into deep time. Comparison and contrast of the geologic history of the Tibetan and Colorado Plateaus. understood in terms of plate tectonics, reveals principles for interpreting earth’s dynamic landscapes.

The Earth system—the atmosphere and oceans, the icecaps and glaciers, the soil and vegetation, and the animals and insects—is a complex, interacting system with both strong and delicate feedbacks that govern the climate and the habitability of our planet.
–Ian Roulstone & John Norbury, Invisible in the Storm (Princeton: 2010), pp.44-45

2. Prerequisites:

English proficiency.
Familiarity with geologic or geographic concepts at an introductory level.
Willingness to study original research in an unfamiliar discipline.
Curiosity about how landscapes form.

3. Concept Maps of Concept Meaning and Vee Diagrams (the “big picture”):

outline1

outline2

outline3

4a. Concept Maps of Topics:

outline5

outline4

outline9

outline6

outline7

outline8

4b Topics:

Concept Maps, Vee Diagrams, and Principles of Geologic Reasoning
Novak, J.D. (1990). Concept mapping and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.
Ault, C. (2015). Gowin’s Knowledge Vee Answers Five Questions about Inquiry. Notes for the BNU Cmap and Vee Diagram Workshop. Unpublished manuscript.
Ault, C. (2017). Thinking Geologic Thoughts: Responding To the Challenges Of Inquiry; 1st Asian Pacific Conference on Concept Mapping, September 20-22, 2017, Beijing Normal University.
Romey, W. D. (1983). Winter Ice and Snow as Models of Igneous Rock Formation. Journal of Geological Education , 31, 9-12.

Patterns of Plate Tectonics
Molnar, Pe. (2015). Plate Tectonics: A Very Short Introduction by Peter Molnar (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).

Cascadia Subduction Zone Processes
Ault, C. Review of The Orphan Tsunami of 1700. (2006). Prepared for the University of Washington Press.

Formation of the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River
Pederson, J. L. (2007). The Mystery of the Pre–Grand Canyon Colorado River—Results from the Muddy Creek Formation: GSA Today, v. 183, p. 4-10. doi: 10.1130/GSAT01803A.
Karlstrom, K., et al. (2012). Introduction: CRevolution 2: Origin and evolution of the Colorado River system II. Geosphere, 8, 1170–1176. doi:10.1130/GES00716.1
Lucchita, I., Holm, R.F., & Lucchitta, B.K. (2013). Implications of the Miocene (?) Crooked Ridge River of northern Arizona for the evolution of the Colorado River and Grand Canyon. Geosphere, 9, 1417–1433. doi:10.1130/GES00861.1

Causes and Consequences of Plateau Uplift (Tibet and Colorado)
Fillmore, R. 2011. Geological Evolution of the Colorado Plateau of Eastern Utah and Western Colorado. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
Fillmore, R. (2011), The Tertiary Period: The Rise of the Colorado Plateau, Geological Evolution of the Colorado Plateau of Eastern Utah and Western Colorado. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
Garzione, Carmala N. (2008). Surface uplift of Tibet and Cenozoic Global Cooling. Geology, 36(12), 1003-1004.doi: 10.1130/focus122008.1
Harrison, M.T., Copeland, P., Kidd, W. S. F., & Yin, An. (1991). Raising Tibet, Science 255, 1663-170. See also “A Quake-Causing Collision Course,” New York Times, May 19, 2015, p. D5.
Raymo, M.E., & Ruddiman, W.F. (1992). Tectonic forcing of late Cenozoic Climate. Nature, 359(6391), 117-122.
Ruddiman, W.F., & Kutzbach, J.E. (1991). Plateau Uplift and Climatic Change: The formation of giant plateaus in Tibet and the American West may explain why the earth’s climate has grown markedly cooler and more regionally diverse in the past 40 million years. Scientific American, 264(3), 66-75.
Searle, M. (2013). Roof of the World in Colliding Continents. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Searle, M. (2013). The Making of the Himalaya/Tibetan Plateau in Colliding Continents. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

4c. Powerpoint resources:

ppt. 001, “Introduction and Analogy.”
ppt. 003, “Colorado Plateau and Plate Tectonics.”
ppt. 002 “Ghost Forests of Cascadia.”
ppt. 005 “Colliding Continents and Plate Driven Tectonics
ppt. 006 “Climate Change and Plateau Uplift
ppt. 009 “Grand Canyon and the Trail of Time

5. Course Arrangement:

  • Field Activity
  •      

    1. Interpreting the viewing stones of the BNU campus
    2. Ice and buoyancy exploration
    3. The rock cycle as displayed in the lobby of the Jingshi Hotel
  • Homework and Classroom Concept Mapping and Vee Diagramming Exercises
  •      

    1. What are the organizing concepts of plate tectonics?
    2. What caused the “Ghost Forests” near the coast in the Pacific Northwest (Cascadia)?
    3. How did the Colorado and Tibetan Plateaus form?
    4. When and how did the Colorado River carve the Grand Canyon?
    5. How are the weathering and uplift of Tibet related to climate change?
    6. Apply principles of geologic reasoning to examples of interpreting Cascadia, Tibet, and the Grand Canyon.

6a. Supporting References:

Blakey, Ron, & Ranney, Wayne. 2008. Ancient Landscapes of the Colorado Plateau. Grand Canyon, AZ: Grand Canyon Association.
Kearey, P. Klepeis, K. A., and Vine, F. J. 2009. Global Tectonics. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nie, J., Horton, B. K., and Hoke, G. D., Eds. 2014. Toward an Improved Understanding of Uplift Mechanisms and the Elevation History of the Tibetan Plateau (GSA Special Paper No. 507). Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.
Searle, M. 2013. Colliding continents: A geological exploration of the Himalaya, Karakoram, and Tibet. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

6b. Projects (3 maps, 1 vee):

1. Concept map: What are the key concepts of plate tectonics?
2. Concept map: How do rocks form?

3a. Concept map: Models of plateau uplift for Tibet and Colorado or
3b. Concept map: Tibetan plateau and climate change

4a. Vee diagram: Carving the Grand Canyon of the Colorado River or
4b. Vee diagram: Creating the Ghost Forest of Cascadia

6c. Expected hours of work:

Daily reading of Plate Tectonics text by Molnar and research articles for each topic (1-2 hours/day).
Concept map construction and revision daily both during the workshop and as homework working with partners (1-3 hours/day plus evening class).

《学会学习和思考之环境科学》设计

按照Teach Less, Learn More课程体系的一般设计要求《学会学习和思考》的设计原则,我们做了《学会学习和思考科学和科学教育模块》的设计。

Meaningful Learning in a Systems Approach to Environmental Science: An Illustration of Learning How to Learn the Tools of Thinking

Concept Mapping and Vee Diagrams
 
Beijing Normal University, Oct. 10 – Oct. 21, 2016

Michael Brody PhD
Montana State University, College of Education, Health and Human Development
Bozeman, Montana USA

In this course students will use two meaningful teaching and learning techniques, concept mapping and Vee diagrams, to better understand a systems science approach in environmental science. Concept maps and Vee diagrams are explained in the book Learning How to Learn by Joseph Novak and D. Bob Gowin. (1984) We will use a website called the Habitable Planet: A Systems Approach to Environmental Science as the science content. This website was awarded the Science Prize for Online Science Resource in Education (SPORE) by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). Each day the class will take a single chapter of the Habitable Planet and use concept mapping and Vee diagrams to analyze the content from a systems science approach. We will use Cmap software to build concept maps.

Meaningful Learning and Learning How to Learn: Concept Mapping and Vee Diagrams

Meaningful learning requires making connections among concepts and from concepts to experiences. When structured around core concepts, these connections lead to disciplinary expertise and insight.

Habits of mind characteristic of different disciplines develop in response to distinct challenges. As a result the structures of knowledge differ from one field to another. Concept mapping and Vee diagramming promise to bring such structures into focus, making learning efficient. (Concept maps are drawings that depict networks of relationships and hierarchy among concepts. Vee diagrams help the learner to represent the structure of knowledge in the context of a scientific inquiry.)

Habitable Planet: A Systems Approach to Environmental Science

https://www.learner.org/courses/envsci/

Earth is probably unique in the solar system, if not in the universe, because it is a platform that can support complex life forms. Conditions on Earth (temperatures, atmosphere, availability of minerals essential to life) are all maintained by a series of global cycles that link geological systems (plate tectonics, weathering, ocean, and atmospheric transport) with the diverse forms of life (particularly bacteria) that are present in almost every available niche.

The course begins by asking “What makes Earth unique among planets?” We will then go on to answer that question through the first four units, which provide a background for understanding and discussing the natural functioning of the different Earth systems: geophysical systems, the atmosphere, the oceans, and, finally, natural ecosystems. The next two units (“Human Population Dynamics” and “Risk, Exposure, and Health”) introduce humans as part of the overall ecosystem and look at what is needed to sustain human life. These are followed by a series of units that each deal with the effects of human actions on different natural systems: land use, air and water pollution, biodiversity decline, the extraction of resources, and finally, global issues such as climate change. The final unit looks toward the future and discusses in scientific terms what can be predicted, given current trends, as well as what might be expected if humans act in concert to mitigate their impact on the planetary system.

Accompanying each unit are video case studies that describe current, on-going research programs. Together, these case studies represent a fair cross section of the current “state of the art” in environmental science research. Designed to provoke curiosity and give a human face to many of the issues raised in the units, these videos will motivate and stimulate students to explore the themes through further readings and discussion.

Five interactive web simulations also reinforce the concepts we introduce, as well as teach about modeling environmental systems by providing opportunities to manipulate and experiment with natural systems.

Systems Thinking

The list of systems thinking skills is extensive and diverse, but mostly comprises the ability to see circular cause effect relations and the ability to synthesize elements to reveal a system’s structure. Specific systems thinking skills include: the ability to understand how the behavior of a system arises from the interaction of its agents over time (i.e. dynamic complexity); discover and represent feedback processes (both positive and negative) hypothesized to underlie observed patterns of system behavior; identify stock and flow relationships; recognize delays and understand their impact; identify nonlinearities; recognize and challenge the boundaries of mental (and formal) models. A number of evaluative testing studies have attempted to link systems thinking/system dynamics education with important skills such as efficient communication, planning, problem solving, and organizational development skills. (Molina and Medina-Borja 2006)

Expected Course Outcomes

Students will have a better understanding of:

  • Concepts
    1. Learning how to learn and meaningful learning
    2. a systems approach to environmental science content
    3. how scientists conduct field and laboratory investigations in environmental science
    4. attitudes, values and beliefs related to environmental science content
  • Skills
    1. how to use concept mapping to organize content and think deeper and clearly about environmental science
    2. learning by doing; discussion and critical feedback
    3. develop relational and critical thinking skills
    4. how to use the Vee diagram to analyze scientific investigations in environmental science
    5. how concept maps and Vee diagrams promote meaningful learning
    6. teaching concept mapping and Vee diagraming to your students
  • Dispositions
    1. the value of concept mapping in learning how to learn
    2. the value of Vee diagrams in learning how to learn
    3. the value of a systems approach to environmental science
    4. importance of meaningful learning in environmental science
    5. value of higher order learning (application, analysis, synthesis, evaluation) in learning environmental science systems approach
    6. value of concept mapping and Vee diagrams in teaching for meaningful learning

Course Structure

  1. Students are expected to decide environmental science topics of their own choice and work in small groups
  2. Each class will focus on a section of the Habitable Planet; concept mapping the text and Vee diagraming the Scientific Investigations of each video
  3. There will be some small leactures but most of the class time will be about doing concept mapping of the environmental science content and Vee diagraming the research associated with each topic.
  4. Students in this class will prepare a concept map of a selected environmental science topic and present the map to the class
  5. Students will construct a Vee diagram of a unique research project related to the environmental science topic in their concept map
  6. The grade for the course is based on module reflections including both modules (50%), the final concept map of your unique environmental science topic (25%) and unique Vee diagram (25%)

《学会学习和思考之教育和教育研究》设计

按照Teach Less, Learn More课程体系的一般设计要求《学会学习和思考》的设计原则,我们做了《教育和教育研究》的设计。

Effective Use of Concept Maps for Teaching, Learning, and Research
Dr. Simone C. O. Conceição, Professor, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

Simone_Course

This module will introduce you to effective strategies for using concept maps for teaching, learning, and research. At the end of this module, you will will be able to use concept maps as an approach for teaching and learning in different disciplines; create a blueprint incorporating concept map as a learning strategy; identify ways for using concept maps as a research tool for data collection, analysis, and presentation; and develop a plan for using concept maps for conducting research.

This module will involve presentation of concepts and theories via lecture, group discussion, and individual and group practice using IHMC CmapTools Software.

This module will be taught in English. You will be expected to complete assignments in English.

It is expected that you will have some knowledge of the use of concept maps and skills on how to use IHMC CmapTools Software. Also, you will be expected to complete readings before attending sessions.

Module Outline

Simone_Course2

Day One

Introductions, Getting to Know Participants, Needs assessment, Scavenger Hunt, Pedagogical and Theoretical Approaches for Using Concept Maps, Types of Concept Maps, Learning strategies using concept maps

DAY Two

Learning strategies using concept maps in different disciplines

DAY Three

Teaching strategies using concept maps in different disciplines: activities

DAY Four

Teaching strategies using concept maps in different disciplines: assessments

DAY Five

Research strategies using concept maps: data collection and analysis

DAY Six
Research strategies using concept maps: data presentation

Learning Assessment
Students will be graded based on participation in course activities, course blueprint, module reflections, and final presentation.

References

Burke, J. G., O’Campo, P., Peak, G. L., Gielen, A. C., McDonnell, K. A., & Trochim, W. M. (2005). An introduction to concept mapping as a participatory public health research method. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1392-1410.
Butler-Kisber, L., & Poldma, T. (2010). The Power of Visual Approaches in Qualitative Inquiry: The Use of Collage Making and Concept Mapping in Experiential Research. Journal of Research Practice, 6(2). Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/197/196
Campbell, R., & Salem, D. A. (1999). Concept Mapping as a Feminist Research Method Examining the Community Response to Rape. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(1), 65-89.
Cañas, A. J., & Novak, J. D. (2006). Using concept maps to organize information for large-scale literature reviews and technical reports: two case studies.
Conceição, S. C. O., & Taylor, L. D. (2007). Using a constructivist approach with online concept maps: Relationship between theory and nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(5), 268-75. National League for Nursing.
Conceição, S. C. O, Baldor, M. J. & Desnoyers, C. A. (2009). Factors influencing individual construction of knowledge in an online community of learning and inquiry using concept maps. In R. Marriott & P. Torres (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Collaborative Learning using Concept Mapping, 100-119. IGI Global.
Daley, B. J., Canas, A. J., & Stark, T. (2007). CmapTools: Integrating teaching, learning, and evaluation in online modules. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2007, 113, 37-47.
Daley, B. J., Conceição, S. C. O., Mina, L., Altman, B., Baldor, M.J., & Brown, J. (2010). Concept mapping: A strategy to support the development of practice, research, and theory within human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, XX(X), 1-28.
Hay, D. B. & Kinchin, E. M. (2006). Using concept maps to reveal conceptual typologies. Education & Training, 48 (2/3), 127-142.
Jackson, K. M., & Trochim, W. M. (2002). Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses. Organizational Research Methods, 5(4), 307-336.
Kinchin, I. M., Streatfield, D., & Hay, D. B. (2010). Using Concept Mapping to Enhance the Research Interview. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1).
Meagher-Stewart, D., Solberg, S. M., Warner, G., MacDonald, J., McPherson, C., & Seaman, P. (2012). Understanding the Role of Communities of Practice in Evidence-Informed Decision Making in Public Health. Qualitative Health Research, 20(10),1-17.
Morrison, D. (2006). Critical Thinking in a Collaborative Online Learning Environment. Advanced Technology for Learning, 3(4), 255-262.
Richardson, R. (2007). Using concept maps as a tool for cross-language relevance determination. (Order No. 3288675, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 196. Retrieved from https://ezproxy.lib.uwm.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/304792723?accountid=15078. (304792723).
Trochim, W. K. Concept Mapping, available at http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/conmap.htm
Trochim, W., & Kane, M. (2005). Concept mapping: an introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 17(3), 187-191.
Wheeldon, J., & Faubert, J. (2009). Framing Experience: Concept Maps, Mind Maps, and Data Collection in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3).
Wheeldon, J. (2010). Mapping mixed methods research: Methods, measures, and meaning. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(2), 87-102.
Wheeldon, J. (2011). Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Using Mind Maps to Facilitate Participant Recall in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Report, 16(2), 509-522.